Part Time Financial Adviser (Butterworth and Surrounds)
Old Mutual
Job Description
for intro paragraphs and general text. Use
for section headers like Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role. Use - for list items (duties, requirements, qualifications, skills). No CSS classes, no inline styles, no , no
. Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If text has no clear sections, just wrap paragraphs in tags.
We need to parse the given raw text (which includes HTML tags and styling). We must extract the content and produce HTML with only
,
, - . Must preserve original content word-for-word.
We need to remove styling tags etc. The original content includes:
-
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
- Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
-
-
- Part-time opportunity:
- - Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
-
- Skills
-
-
- Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
-
-
- Competencies
-
-
- Action Oriented
-
-
- Balances Stakeholders
-
-
- Builds Networks
-
-
- Collaborates
-
-
- Communicates Effectively
-
-
- Customer Focus
-
-
- Drives Results
-
-
- Ensures Accountability
-
-
-
- Education
- NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent
-
- Closing Date
- 30 October 2026 , 23:59
-
-
-
-
- The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
-
-
- The Old Mutual Story!
We need to output HTML with for paragraphs,
for section headers. The sections we have: Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date, maybe also "Part-time opportunity:" is a header? It's bolded but not a section header per list; but we could treat as maybe? The instruction: Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). So we should map those. We have Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date (maybe not a standard header but could be treated as ). Also "Part-time opportunity:" maybe not a standard header but could be considered a heading. However we must preserve content word-for-word; we can wrap the bold text in if it's a section header. The original had
Part-time opportunity:
. That is a paragraph with bold text. According to rules, we should use for section headers. So we can convert that to Part-time opportunity:
. Similarly for Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date.
We also have list items under Part-time opportunity: that is a with many - . Those are requirements/qualifications. Should stay as
- . Good.
After Skills header, we have a paragraph of skills list: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, ...". That's not a list but a sentence. Should we wrap in
. Yes.
After Competencies header, we have a series of competency names each preceded by empty
tags. The original shows:
Competencies
Action Oriented
Balances Stakeholders
Builds Networks
Collaborates
Communicates Effectively
Customer Focus
Drives Results
Ensures Accountability
So after Competencies header, there are blank paragraphs, then "Action Oriented", then two empty h3 tags, then "Balances Stakeholders", etc. The empty h3 tags are likely artifacts; we should ignore them (they are empty). We need to preserve content word-for-word, but we cannot add or remove content. However we can remove empty tags? The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. That suggests we must keep everything exactly as is, but we are to output HTML with only certain tags. However we cannot keep the empty because we are not allowed to use (only for section headers). Also we cannot add tags not allowed. The instruction: "Use for section headers ... No CSS classes, no inline styles, no s, no
tags". It doesn't forbid other tags like explicitly, but says use for section headers. It doesn't say we cannot use other tags, but likely we should only use
,
, - . The empty tags have no content; if we keep them, they'd be empty tags which might be considered adding? They are original content but empty. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. If we drop them, we are removing content (even if empty). However maybe we can treat them as whitespace and ignore? The safer approach: we could keep them as but that violates the instruction to use
for section headers (but not forbid other tags). However the instruction says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't say we cannot use other tags for other purposes. But later: "No CSS classes, no inline styles, no s, no
tags". It doesn't forbid . So we could keep . However the empty tags might be considered unnecessary but not disallowed. However the instruction to "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word" suggests we should not strip anything, even empty tags. But we also need to convert the given HTML to clean semantic HTML; we are allowed to strip styling and classes etc. The empty have no class or style, just empty. Should we keep them? Probably we can drop them because they add no semantic value and are likely artifacts. The rule about preserving content likely refers to textual content, not empty tags. I'd assume we can ignore empty tags.
Thus we will output:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Part-time opportunity:
- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
Skills
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
Competencies
Action Oriented
Balances Stakeholders
Builds Networks
Collaborates
Communicates Effectively
Customer Focus
Drives Results
Ensures Accountability
Education
NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent
Closing Date
30 October 2026 , 23:59
The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
The Old Mutual Story!
But we need to preserve original content word-for-word. The original had italic and bold around "The Old Mutual Story!" inside span with class emphasis-2 and i b b i. The content: The Old Mutual Story!. That yields italic, bold, bold, italic? Actually nested: i b b The Old Mutual Story! /b /b /i. So effectively bold and italic. We need to preserve the text "The Old Mutual Story!" but we lost the italic and bold tags. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. That includes the italic and bold formatting? However we are not allowed to use inline styles or classes, but we can use semantic tags like and . The instruction didn't forbid or . It only said use for introductory paragraphs and general text,
for section headers, - for list items. It didn't say we cannot use other tags like or . However it said "No CSS classes, no inline styles, no s, no
tags". So we can use and . So we should keep the italic and bold formatting. The original had The Old Mutual Story!. That's redundant but we can keep as The Old Mutual Story! (since double bold same). But to preserve word-for-word, we should keep the exact nesting: The Old Mutual Story!. However that's weird but okay.
Similarly earlier we had The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
. We should keep that as ...
.
Also earlier we had Part-time opportunity:
. We turned into Part-time opportunity:
. That changes the tag from to . Is that allowed? The instruction says use for section headers. So we should convert that to . That's altering the tag but preserving the text content. The bold inside is removed; but we could keep bold inside ? The original had bold; we could keep Part-time opportunity:
. That would preserve the bold. However the instruction says use for section headers; it doesn't forbid inner tags. So we can do Part-time opportunity:
. Similarly for Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date: original had
Skills
. We can convert to Skills
. That preserves bold.
Thus we need to keep bold tags inside headers.
Also we need to preserve the original text exactly, including spaces and punctuation. Let's extract each piece.
Let's reconstruct the original textual content with tags stripped but preserving inner formatting.
Original snippet:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Part-time opportunity:
- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
Skills
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
Competencies
Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommun
Apply Now ↗
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️
Free cover letter for this job
Upload your CV and get a tailored cover letter in seconds — free, no account needed.
Generate a Cover Letter 📝
. Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. If text has no clear sections, just wrap paragraphs in
tags. We need to parse the given raw text (which includes HTML tags and styling). We must extract the content and produce HTML with only
,
, - . Must preserve original content word-for-word.
We need to remove styling tags etc. The original content includes:
-
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
- Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
-
-
- Part-time opportunity:
- - Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
-
- Skills
-
-
- Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
-
-
- Competencies
-
-
- Action Oriented
-
-
- Balances Stakeholders
-
-
- Builds Networks
-
-
- Collaborates
-
-
- Communicates Effectively
-
-
- Customer Focus
-
-
- Drives Results
-
-
- Ensures Accountability
-
-
-
- Education
- NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent
-
- Closing Date
- 30 October 2026 , 23:59
-
-
-
-
- The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
-
-
- The Old Mutual Story!
We need to output HTML with for paragraphs,
for section headers. The sections we have: Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date, maybe also "Part-time opportunity:" is a header? It's bolded but not a section header per list; but we could treat as maybe? The instruction: Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). So we should map those. We have Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date (maybe not a standard header but could be treated as ). Also "Part-time opportunity:" maybe not a standard header but could be considered a heading. However we must preserve content word-for-word; we can wrap the bold text in if it's a section header. The original had
Part-time opportunity:
. That is a paragraph with bold text. According to rules, we should use for section headers. So we can convert that to Part-time opportunity:
. Similarly for Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date.
We also have list items under Part-time opportunity: that is a with many - . Those are requirements/qualifications. Should stay as
- . Good.
After Skills header, we have a paragraph of skills list: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, ...". That's not a list but a sentence. Should we wrap in
. Yes.
After Competencies header, we have a series of competency names each preceded by empty
tags. The original shows:
Competencies
Action Oriented
Balances Stakeholders
Builds Networks
Collaborates
Communicates Effectively
Customer Focus
Drives Results
Ensures Accountability
So after Competencies header, there are blank paragraphs, then "Action Oriented", then two empty h3 tags, then "Balances Stakeholders", etc. The empty h3 tags are likely artifacts; we should ignore them (they are empty). We need to preserve content word-for-word, but we cannot add or remove content. However we can remove empty tags? The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. That suggests we must keep everything exactly as is, but we are to output HTML with only certain tags. However we cannot keep the empty because we are not allowed to use (only for section headers). Also we cannot add tags not allowed. The instruction: "Use for section headers ... No CSS classes, no inline styles, no s, no
tags". It doesn't forbid other tags like explicitly, but says use for section headers. It doesn't say we cannot use other tags, but likely we should only use
,
, - . The empty tags have no content; if we keep them, they'd be empty tags which might be considered adding? They are original content but empty. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. If we drop them, we are removing content (even if empty). However maybe we can treat them as whitespace and ignore? The safer approach: we could keep them as but that violates the instruction to use
for section headers (but not forbid other tags). However the instruction says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't say we cannot use other tags for other purposes. But later: "No CSS classes, no inline styles, no s, no
tags". It doesn't forbid . So we could keep . However the empty tags might be considered unnecessary but not disallowed. However the instruction to "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word" suggests we should not strip anything, even empty tags. But we also need to convert the given HTML to clean semantic HTML; we are allowed to strip styling and classes etc. The empty have no class or style, just empty. Should we keep them? Probably we can drop them because they add no semantic value and are likely artifacts. The rule about preserving content likely refers to textual content, not empty tags. I'd assume we can ignore empty tags.
Thus we will output:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Part-time opportunity:
- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
Skills
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
Competencies
Action Oriented
Balances Stakeholders
Builds Networks
Collaborates
Communicates Effectively
Customer Focus
Drives Results
Ensures Accountability
Education
NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent
Closing Date
30 October 2026 , 23:59
The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
The Old Mutual Story!
But we need to preserve original content word-for-word. The original had italic and bold around "The Old Mutual Story!" inside span with class emphasis-2 and i b b i. The content: The Old Mutual Story!. That yields italic, bold, bold, italic? Actually nested: i b b The Old Mutual Story! /b /b /i. So effectively bold and italic. We need to preserve the text "The Old Mutual Story!" but we lost the italic and bold tags. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. That includes the italic and bold formatting? However we are not allowed to use inline styles or classes, but we can use semantic tags like and . The instruction didn't forbid or . It only said use for introductory paragraphs and general text,
for section headers, - for list items. It didn't say we cannot use other tags like or . However it said "No CSS classes, no inline styles, no s, no
tags". So we can use and . So we should keep the italic and bold formatting. The original had The Old Mutual Story!. That's redundant but we can keep as The Old Mutual Story! (since double bold same). But to preserve word-for-word, we should keep the exact nesting: The Old Mutual Story!. However that's weird but okay.
Similarly earlier we had The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
. We should keep that as ...
.
Also earlier we had Part-time opportunity:
. We turned into Part-time opportunity:
. That changes the tag from to . Is that allowed? The instruction says use for section headers. So we should convert that to . That's altering the tag but preserving the text content. The bold inside is removed; but we could keep bold inside ? The original had bold; we could keep Part-time opportunity:
. That would preserve the bold. However the instruction says use for section headers; it doesn't forbid inner tags. So we can do Part-time opportunity:
. Similarly for Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date: original had
Skills
. We can convert to Skills
. That preserves bold.
Thus we need to keep bold tags inside headers.
Also we need to preserve the original text exactly, including spaces and punctuation. Let's extract each piece.
Let's reconstruct the original textual content with tags stripped but preserving inner formatting.
Original snippet:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Part-time opportunity:
- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
Skills
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
Competencies
Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommun
Apply Now ↗
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️
Free cover letter for this job
Upload your CV and get a tailored cover letter in seconds — free, no account needed.
Generate a Cover Letter 📝
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
-Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
- - -Part-time opportunity:
-- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
Skills
- - - Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships - - -Competencies
- - - Action Oriented - - - Balances Stakeholders - - - Builds Networks - - - Collaborates - - - Communicates Effectively - - - Customer Focus - - - Drives Results - - - Ensures Accountability - - - -Education
- NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent - -Closing Date
- 30 October 2026 , 23:59 - - - - -The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
- - -The Old Mutual Story!
We need to output HTML withfor paragraphs,
for section headers. The sections we have: Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date, maybe also "Part-time opportunity:" is a header? It's bolded but not a section header per list; but we could treat as maybe? The instruction: Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). So we should map those. We have Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date (maybe not a standard header but could be treated as ). Also "Part-time opportunity:" maybe not a standard header but could be considered a heading. However we must preserve content word-for-word; we can wrap the bold text in if it's a section header. The original had
for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). So we should map those. We have Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date (maybe not a standard header but could be treated as ). Also "Part-time opportunity:" maybe not a standard header but could be considered a heading. However we must preserve content word-for-word; we can wrap the bold text in if it's a section header. The original had
if it's a section header. The original had
Part-time opportunity:
. That is a paragraph with bold text. According to rules, we should use for section headers. So we can convert that to Part-time opportunity:
. Similarly for Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date.
We also have list items under Part-time opportunity: that is a with many - . Those are requirements/qualifications. Should stay as
- . Good.
After Skills header, we have a paragraph of skills list: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, ...". That's not a list but a sentence. Should we wrap in
. Yes.
After Competencies header, we have a series of competency names each preceded by empty
tags. The original shows:
Competencies
Action Oriented
Balances Stakeholders
Builds Networks
Collaborates
Communicates Effectively
Customer Focus
Drives Results
Ensures Accountability
So after Competencies header, there are blank paragraphs, then "Action Oriented", then two empty h3 tags, then "Balances Stakeholders", etc. The empty h3 tags are likely artifacts; we should ignore them (they are empty). We need to preserve content word-for-word, but we cannot add or remove content. However we can remove empty tags? The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. That suggests we must keep everything exactly as is, but we are to output HTML with only certain tags. However we cannot keep the empty because we are not allowed to use (only for section headers). Also we cannot add tags not allowed. The instruction: "Use for section headers ... No CSS classes, no inline styles, no s, no
tags". It doesn't forbid other tags like explicitly, but says use for section headers. It doesn't say we cannot use other tags, but likely we should only use
,
, - . The empty tags have no content; if we keep them, they'd be empty tags which might be considered adding? They are original content but empty. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. If we drop them, we are removing content (even if empty). However maybe we can treat them as whitespace and ignore? The safer approach: we could keep them as but that violates the instruction to use
for section headers (but not forbid other tags). However the instruction says "Use for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't say we cannot use other tags for other purposes. But later: "No CSS classes, no inline styles, no s, no
tags". It doesn't forbid . So we could keep . However the empty tags might be considered unnecessary but not disallowed. However the instruction to "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word" suggests we should not strip anything, even empty tags. But we also need to convert the given HTML to clean semantic HTML; we are allowed to strip styling and classes etc. The empty have no class or style, just empty. Should we keep them? Probably we can drop them because they add no semantic value and are likely artifacts. The rule about preserving content likely refers to textual content, not empty tags. I'd assume we can ignore empty tags.
Thus we will output:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Part-time opportunity:
- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
Skills
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
Competencies
Action Oriented
Balances Stakeholders
Builds Networks
Collaborates
Communicates Effectively
Customer Focus
Drives Results
Ensures Accountability
Education
NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent
Closing Date
30 October 2026 , 23:59
The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
The Old Mutual Story!
But we need to preserve original content word-for-word. The original had italic and bold around "The Old Mutual Story!" inside span with class emphasis-2 and i b b i. The content: The Old Mutual Story!. That yields italic, bold, bold, italic? Actually nested: i b b The Old Mutual Story! /b /b /i. So effectively bold and italic. We need to preserve the text "The Old Mutual Story!" but we lost the italic and bold tags. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. That includes the italic and bold formatting? However we are not allowed to use inline styles or classes, but we can use semantic tags like and . The instruction didn't forbid or . It only said use for introductory paragraphs and general text,
for section headers, - for list items. It didn't say we cannot use other tags like or . However it said "No CSS classes, no inline styles, no s, no
tags". So we can use and . So we should keep the italic and bold formatting. The original had The Old Mutual Story!. That's redundant but we can keep as The Old Mutual Story! (since double bold same). But to preserve word-for-word, we should keep the exact nesting: The Old Mutual Story!. However that's weird but okay.
Similarly earlier we had The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
. We should keep that as ...
.
Also earlier we had Part-time opportunity:
. We turned into Part-time opportunity:
. That changes the tag from to . Is that allowed? The instruction says use for section headers. So we should convert that to . That's altering the tag but preserving the text content. The bold inside is removed; but we could keep bold inside ? The original had bold; we could keep Part-time opportunity:
. That would preserve the bold. However the instruction says use for section headers; it doesn't forbid inner tags. So we can do Part-time opportunity:
. Similarly for Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date: original had
Skills
. We can convert to Skills
. That preserves bold.
Thus we need to keep bold tags inside headers.
Also we need to preserve the original text exactly, including spaces and punctuation. Let's extract each piece.
Let's reconstruct the original textual content with tags stripped but preserving inner formatting.
Original snippet:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Part-time opportunity:
- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
Skills
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
Competencies
Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommun
Apply Now ↗
How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️
Free cover letter for this job
Upload your CV and get a tailored cover letter in seconds — free, no account needed.
Generate a Cover Letter 📝
- . Good.
After Skills header, we have a paragraph of skills list: "Building Trust, Consultative Selling, ...". That's not a list but a sentence. Should we wrap in
. Yes. After Competencies header, we have a series of competency names each preceded by empty
tags. The original shows:Competencies
Action Oriented Balances Stakeholders Builds Networks Collaborates Communicates Effectively Customer Focus Drives Results Ensures Accountability So after Competencies header, there are blank paragraphs, then "Action Oriented", then two empty h3 tags, then "Balances Stakeholders", etc. The empty h3 tags are likely artifacts; we should ignore them (they are empty). We need to preserve content word-for-word, but we cannot add or remove content. However we can remove empty tags? The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. That suggests we must keep everything exactly as is, but we are to output HTML with only certain tags. However we cannot keep the empty because we are not allowed to use(only
for section headers). Also we cannot add tags not allowed. The instruction: "Use
for section headers ... No CSS classes, no inline styles, no
s, no
tags". It doesn't forbid other tags likeexplicitly, but says use
for section headers. It doesn't say we cannot use other tags, but likely we should only use
,
,
- . The empty tags have no content; if we keep them, they'd be empty tags which might be considered adding? They are original content but empty. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. If we drop them, we are removing content (even if empty). However maybe we can treat them as whitespace and ignore? The safer approach: we could keep them as but that violates the instruction to use
for section headers (but not forbid other tags). However the instruction says "Use
for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role)". It doesn't say we cannot use other tags for other purposes. But later: "No CSS classes, no inline styles, no
s, no
tags". It doesn't forbid. So we could keep . However the empty tags might be considered unnecessary but not disallowed. However the instruction to "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word" suggests we should not strip anything, even empty tags. But we also need to convert the given HTML to clean semantic HTML; we are allowed to strip styling and classes etc. The empty have no class or style, just empty. Should we keep them? Probably we can drop them because they add no semantic value and are likely artifacts. The rule about preserving content likely refers to textual content, not empty tags. I'd assume we can ignore empty tags. Thus we will output:
Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Part-time opportunity:
- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
Skills
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer Relationships
Competencies
Action Oriented
Balances Stakeholders
Builds Networks
Collaborates
Communicates Effectively
Customer Focus
Drives Results
Ensures Accountability
Education
NQF Level 4 - Grade 12, School leaving Certificate, National or Occupational Certificate or equivalent
Closing Date
30 October 2026 , 23:59
The appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
The Old Mutual Story!
But we need to preserve original content word-for-word. The original had italic and bold around "The Old Mutual Story!" inside span with class emphasis-2 and i b b i. The content: The Old Mutual Story!. That yields italic, bold, bold, italic? Actually nested: i b b The Old Mutual Story! /b /b /i. So effectively bold and italic. We need to preserve the text "The Old Mutual Story!" but we lost the italic and bold tags. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. That includes the italic and bold formatting? However we are not allowed to use inline styles or classes, but we can use semantic tags like and . The instruction didn't forbid or . It only said usefor introductory paragraphs and general text,
for section headers,
- for list items. It didn't say we cannot use other tags like or . However it said "No CSS classes, no inline styles, no s, no
tags". So we can use and . So we should keep the italic and bold formatting. The original had The Old Mutual Story!. That's redundant but we can keep as The Old Mutual Story! (since double bold same). But to preserve word-for-word, we should keep the exact nesting: The Old Mutual Story!. However that's weird but okay. Similarly earlier we hadThe appointment will be made from the designated group in line with the Employment Equity Plan of Old Mutual South Africa and the specific business unit in question.
. We should keep that as...
. Also earlier we hadPart-time opportunity:
. We turned intoPart-time opportunity:
. That changes the tag fromto
. Is that allowed? The instruction says use
for section headers. So we should convert that to
. That's altering the tag but preserving the text content. The bold inside is removed; but we could keep bold inside
? The original had bold; we could keep
Part-time opportunity:
. That would preserve the bold. However the instruction says usefor section headers; it doesn't forbid inner tags. So we can do
Part-time opportunity:
. Similarly for Skills, Competencies, Education, Closing Date: original hadSkills
. We can convert toSkills
. That preserves bold. Thus we need to keep bold tags inside headers. Also we need to preserve the original text exactly, including spaces and punctuation. Let's extract each piece. Let's reconstruct the original textual content with tags stripped but preserving inner formatting. Original snippet:Let's Write Africa's Story Together!
Old Mutual is a firm believer in the African opportunity and our diverse talent reflects this.
Part-time opportunity:
- Part-time Financial Adviser
- Grade 12
- Currently in an existing role which he or she wants to retain, but supplement value proposition and/or income by offering financial advice
- Access to in-segment market and existing network
- DOFA/Fit & proper
- A valid Driver’s licence and own car
- A clear criminal and credit check
- Proven computer literacy and digital dexterity
- Excellent communication skills (written and verbal)
- Sound planning and organising abilities
- Ability to collate, analyse and synthesize information
- Entrepreneurial mindset
- Sound business acumen
- GRIT, resilience and tenacity to stay the course.
- Sales orientation
Skills
Building Trust, Consultative Selling, Customer-Focused, Customer Service, Customer Understanding, Direct Selling, Identifying Sales Opportunities, Oral Communications, Probing Questions, Qualifying Prospects, Sales Data Management, Sales Software, Strategic Selling, Strengthening Customer RelationshipsCompetencies
Action OrientedBalances StakeholdersBuilds NetworksCollaboratesCommun
Apply Now ↗How well do you match?
Get an instant AI match score for this role — free, takes 3 minutes.
Tailor your CV for this role
The concierge rewrites your whole CV and writes a matching cover letter for this job — opens right here, nothing to paste.
Tailor My CV to This Job ✍️Free cover letter for this job
Upload your CV and get a tailored cover letter in seconds — free, no account needed.
Generate a Cover Letter 📝 - . The empty tags have no content; if we keep them, they'd be empty tags which might be considered adding? They are original content but empty. The rule says preserve ALL original content word-for-word. If we drop them, we are removing content (even if empty). However maybe we can treat them as whitespace and ignore? The safer approach: we could keep them as but that violates the instruction to use
Let jobs find you
Leave your email and our AI matches you to new jobs across 24 African markets — free. You wait for the call.
Add your CV for real matches
Upload your CV and we score every new job against your real experience — only strong matches reach your inbox. Optional, but it makes your matches far sharper.
You're in.
We'll email you the moment a job matches your profile. Check your inbox for a welcome from My Job Concierge.
I'm ECHO, your MJC career assistant. I can help you find jobs, explore career tools, and connect with opportunities across Africa.