NE

Scope Technician

Netcare

Full time Waterfall City Hospital, ZA
Posted 1 week, 1 day ago 90 views 0 applications

Job Description

We need to output clean semantic HTML only, using

for intro paragraphs and general text,

for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). Use
  • for list items. No CSS classes, no inline styles, no
    s, no
    tags. Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. So we must output exactly the same text but wrapped appropriately. We need to identify sections: There's "KEY WORK OUTPUT AND ACCOUNTABILITIES" maybe a header. Then subheaders like "CONSISTENCY OF CARE", "TRANSFORMATION OF OUR SOCIETY", "SKILLS PROFILE", "EDUCATION", "PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS", "SKILLS", "Personal Work Ethic", "Building Relationships", "Communication", "Teamwork", "Technical Knowledge", "WORKING CONDITIONS", "NETCARE VALUES AND BEHAVIOURS", "The Netcare Way". Also there are bullet lists under each. We need to use

    for section headers. The instruction says use

    for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). So we should treat each bold heading as a header? The raw text includes bold tags around headings. We need to preserve content word-for-word, but we can wrap the heading text in

    . Should we keep the tags? The instruction: Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. That includes the tags? The raw text includes HTML tags like . But we are to output clean semantic HTML, using

    for section headers. So we should replace the heading tags with

    tags, but preserve the inner text. The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. Does that mean we cannot change the tags? But we are required to use

    for section headers. So we must replace the with

    but keep the same inner text. That is a change of tag but not content. The content inside remains same. That should be okay. We must not add any extra commentary. Just output the HTML. We need to wrap introductory paragraphs and general text in

    . The initial paragraphs before "ROLE SUMMARY" are:

    We provide meaningful careers that connect people with purpose.

    We are united by a common purpose of providing the best and safest care; and by our shared values of Care, Truth, Participation, Compassion and Dignity.

    Netcare invites you to be part of our journey.

    These are empty

    tags; we can keep them? They are empty paragraphs; we can output them as

    maybe but they are empty; but we need to preserve them word-for-word. They are just

    tags. Should we output them? Probably yes, but they are empty; they will be just

    . That's okay. Then "ROLE SUMMARY

    " appears. The
    tags are not allowed (no
    ). We need to preserve them? The instruction says do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. But we cannot output
    tags because not allowed. However we must preserve original content word-for-word. The original includes

    . But we are not allowed to use
    tags. This is a conflict. The instruction says "No CSS classes, no inline styles, no
    s, no
    tags". So we must not output
    . But we must preserve original content word-for-word. However the instruction hierarchy: The user gave rules that we must follow. The rule about no
    tags overrides preserving original content? The instruction says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". But also "No ...
    tags". So we must remove
    tags, but that would be removing content. However the rule about no
    tags is a higher-level constraint? The user explicitly says "No CSS classes, no inline styles, no
    s, no
    tags". That is a rule we must obey. So we must remove
    tags. But preserving content word-for-word seems contradictory. In such cases, we prioritize the explicit formatting rules over preserving tags? The instruction says "Preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase". That suggests we cannot remove anything. But the later rule says no
    tags. Possibly we can keep the
    tags as part of content? But they are not allowed. Hmm. We could treat
    as part of the text that we need to preserve, but we cannot output
    . Maybe we can replace
    with a newline? But we cannot use
    . The instruction says no
    tags. So we must not output them. But we must preserve original content word-for-word. Perhaps we can keep the
    tags as literal text? That would be adding characters? Actually preserving content word-for-word includes the
    tags themselves. But we cannot output them. This is contradictory. In such cases, we need to decide which instruction takes precedence. Usually the later instruction about formatting is more specific. The user wants clean semantic HTML, no
    . So we should remove
    tags but keep the surrounding text. The content "ROLE SUMMARY" remains, but the

    are removed. That is removing content, but maybe it's okay because we are preserving the textual content but not the markup? The instruction says preserve ALL original content word-for-word — do not add, remove, summarise, or rephrase. That includes the
    tags? The
    tags are part of the original content. Removing them would be removing content. However the rule about no
    tags is also part of the instruction. Which is higher? The user explicitly says "No CSS classes, no inline styles, no
    s, no
    tags". That is a rule for the output. So we must not output
    . So we must remove them. That violates the "preserve ALL original content word-for-word". But maybe the intention is to preserve the textual content, not the markup tags. The
    tags are markup, not content. So we can remove them. I think we should remove them. Thus we will output the text without
    tags. Now we need to structure sections. The headings in bold appear as KEY WORK OUTPUT AND ACCOUNTABILITIES etc. We'll replace with

    KEY WORK OUTPUT AND ACCOUNTABILITIES

    . Then we have paragraphs with CONSISTENCY OF CARE etc. Those are also headings? Actually they are subheadings within the list? They appear as

    CONSISTENCY OF CARE

    . That is a paragraph containing bold text. We can treat that as a header? The instruction says use

    for section headers (e.g. Responsibilities, Qualifications, Requirements, Education, Experience, Skills, How to Apply, Key Duties, About the Role). So we should use

    for each such header. So we can wrap the bold text inside

    tags, but we need to preserve the bold? The original had around the text. We can replace with

    but keep the text. So we output

    CONSISTENCY OF CARE

    . That preserves the text. Similarly for "TRANSFORMATION OF OUR SOCIETY", "Personal and professional development", "Build and maintain stakeholder relationships", "DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION", "SKILLS PROFILE", "EDUCATION", "PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS", "SKILLS", "Personal Work Ethic", "Building Relationships", "Communication", "Teamwork", "Technical Knowledge", "WORKING CONDITIONS", "NETCARE VALUES AND BEHAVIOURS", "The Netcare Way". Also there is "KEY WORK OUTPUT AND ACCOUNTABILITIES" earlier. We need to output each as

    ...content...

    . Now the bullet lists: They are inside
    • ...
    . We need to preserve the list items exactly as they appear, including bold tags inside list items? The list items contain bold tags sometimes, e.g.,
  • Ensure replacement, maintenance and repair of scopes are done within the confines of the budget
    • (no bold). Some have
  • ...?? Actually some list items have bold inside? Let's scan. List items under "CONSISTENCY OF CARE" are plain text, no bold. Under "TRANSFORMATION OF OUR SOCIETY" there is a bullet:
  • Arrange in-service training for relevant staff to meet the needs of the theatre department
    • (no bold). Under "Teamwork" bullet:
  • Actively participate as a member of a team to achieve goals
    • . Under "Personal and professional development" bullet list has two items, each plain. Under "Build and maintain stakeholder relationships" bullet list has two items, plain. Under "DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION" bullet list:
  • CareOn adoption of electronic patient records and stock management
    • . Under "EDUCATION" bullet:
  • Grade 12 or equivalent NQF level 4 qualification
    • . Under "PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS" bullet:
  • In the event of any physical or psychological limitation that may impair the employee’s ability to perform the required job function, the employee must consult the employer for reasonable accommodation.
    • . Under "SKILLS" there are subheadings? Actually "SKILLS" is a heading, then "Personal Work Ethic", "Building Relationships", "Communication", "Teamwork", "Technical Knowledge". Those are headings but also bullet items? Actually they are separate headings with bullet lists? Let's see: After "SKILLS PROFILE" there is

    EDUCATION

    Essential

    • Grade 12 or equivalent NQF level 4 qualification
    Then

    PHYSICAL REQUIREMENTS

MJC
ECHO
Your MJC Assistant

I'm ECHO, your MJC career assistant. I can help you find jobs, explore career tools, and connect with opportunities across Africa.

How was your experience with ECHO?